Comments on: Stephen Hawking: Idiot? http://roryparle.com/2006/10/stephen-hawking-idiot/ Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:19:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rory http://roryparle.com/2006/10/stephen-hawking-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-1304 Rory Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:58:26 +0000 http://www.roryparle.com/ported/soylentred.net/542#comment-1304 @NEllyb: Touché! I've now fixed that typo, for the benefit of anyone else who stumbles on this four year old post. @NEllyb: Touché! I’ve now fixed that typo, for the benefit of anyone else who stumbles on this four year old post.

]]> By: NEllyb http://roryparle.com/2006/10/stephen-hawking-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-1276 NEllyb Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:59:22 +0000 http://www.roryparle.com/ported/soylentred.net/542#comment-1276 "No Stephen Hawking isn’t and idiot." This is how the internet works. Stephen Hawking mastered grammar by the third grade. WUddUP “No Stephen Hawking isn’t and idiot.” This is how the internet works. Stephen Hawking mastered grammar by the third grade. WUddUP

]]> By: CfCS http://roryparle.com/2006/10/stephen-hawking-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-1274 CfCS Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:28:25 +0000 http://www.roryparle.com/ported/soylentred.net/542#comment-1274 Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow write a sequel to "A Brief History of Time" to attempt to answer the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything. Both authors assess their belief that the M-Theory is the only viable candidate for a complete "theory of everything". Nothing more far from reality! Once again Hawking presents us his superficial thinking and outdated theories, being completely unaware of recentest scientific advances... Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow write a sequel to “A Brief History of Time” to attempt to answer the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything. Both authors assess their belief that the M-Theory is the only viable candidate for a complete “theory of everything”.

Nothing more far from reality! Once again Hawking presents us his superficial thinking and outdated theories, being completely unaware of recentest scientific advances…

]]> By: Ben http://roryparle.com/2006/10/stephen-hawking-idiot/comment-page-1/#comment-1271 Ben Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:06:10 +0000 http://www.roryparle.com/ported/soylentred.net/542#comment-1271 Yeah, I completely agree. When I saw the title advertised on a bookseller's website I was browsing, I thought "WTF?! Hasn't he learnt his lesson? Why would he do that? Good old Hawking." I wish scientists would be more careful and conservative with the metaphors they use; at least until we rid ourselves of the religious age. It really does dig a muddy grave for the scientist and science in general. I mean, just try to convince a creationist that evolution isn't an increase in "information". Good luck. Yeah, I completely agree. When I saw the title advertised on a bookseller’s website I was browsing, I thought “WTF?! Hasn’t he learnt his lesson? Why would he do that? Good old Hawking.” I wish scientists would be more careful and conservative with the metaphors they use; at least until we rid ourselves of the religious age. It really does dig a muddy grave for the scientist and science in general. I mean, just try to convince a creationist that evolution isn’t an increase in “information”. Good luck.

]]>