Busy Doing Nothing

For some reason my otherwise logical mind is unable to find fault with the fact that, despite spending several hours online today actively surfing, reading blogs and responding to forum questions, I continue to claim that I haven’t got time to write for SoylentRed.net. Out of a 24 hour day (give or take) I can only really see myself spending about three hours studying. Four at a push when I’m less than a week from exams. Yet I find the excuse "I have to study" impinging on every activity that I consider. Blogging has suffered. My birthday celebrations, such as they were, have been cancelled. Time with friends has reduced, possibly because of their false impression of my amount of free time, possibly because I’m not the only one experiencing Farnham.

I think the real reason could be that, while I may not be spending a huge amount of time engrossed in textbooks and largely inadequate notes, my mind is constantly haring between time-like geodesics, Navier-Stokes equations, anomalous Zeeman effects and Lax-Wendroff schemes and every time one of those or any number of other topics springs to mind I’m reminded that in a very short time I’m going to depend on having a very detailed knowledge of each of them. It’s distinctly bothersome that I don’t yet have such a detailed knowledge.

Psst… Google’s Listening

Does anyone else get the impression that Google News knows what the results it gives you are about? Try a search for Gmail Privacy, which you understandably would if you wanted a range of views on the concerns people have been expressing about Gmail’s Privacy Policy (single cookie for search and email, no guarantee that emails will be deleted, etc.). In case the top two results have changed since I did the search, I got Google Responds to Gmail Privacy Concerns and Google Gmail Privacy Issue Overblown before any of the negative press.

Okay, time for a huge change of tack. I was about to suggest that we all know the result of a search for ‘best search engine’, but I just did that search to make sure and Google was below the fold in the first page of results. I removed the word ‘best’, but still no Google; AltaVista took the top spot. Reducing to simply ‘search’ left Google at the number six spot. It’s just as well I wasn’t actually looking for a search engine, because those are bad results. Shame on Google.

The Fool That Leads Them

Yes it’s a nonsensical title, but I think it works well with the last post. Anyway, I just wanted to note that, despite my grouching, there was one very good and very successful April Fools joke this year: Gmail. The genius of this prank is that it is real. All 1GB each of it is real. And so many people were convinced it wasn’t. Bravo to Google. I think I’ll have me one of those spamtraps.

The Fool That Follows Him

I was making some little UI changes (specifically the new permalink icon and the toggle comments function) when I noticed my post from last year on the annoyance of April Fools Day (or is it Fools’/Fool’s?) My attitute has not changed. I might be amused by some of this crap if it was possible to get some real news or opinions but it seems the whole web just shuts down for the day in favour of some crappy jokes that no-one with a half-functioning (or better) brain could ever fall for. And if something is convincing enough, then it’s still a bad joke because there should be something to tip us off. Bah! I’m sorry, I might be able to cope better if I hadn’t bruised my arm.

Uncle Sam Wants…

Edit 19 June 2005: This entry used to consist simply of a picture of Christopher Walken dressed as Uncle Sam with the caption "Uncle Sam wants more cowbell". This picture has since been removed on the grounds that I never had any right to publish it in the first place. It was also generating traffic to the site that essentially had nothing to do with anything I wrote or created.

There’s… Something Out There. Some… Thing!

There’s some discussion going on at the moment about Sedna, specifically about whether or not it should be called a planet. Oddly, I seem to be the only person who thinks it should be called a planet, but it shouldn’t be called Sedna. In the words of Lisa Simpson, "That’s not Latin!" Anyway, some of this discussion happened at slashdot, and a particular subthread led to an interesting assertion: that children can be made to want to learn by demonstrating that there’s something interesting to be learned.

An easy example is the degree of interest in dinosaurs after the release of Jurassic Park. Kids saw that instead of boring ‘…168 million years ago…’ and ‘…fish crawled onto land…’, they could learn about huge, terrifying monsters that ran and jumped and did exciting and gory things to each other for millenia. They could see what was so cool about these things.

Now think about what you learned about astronomy in school. You most likely know a mnemonic to remember the nine major planets. You may know they have near-circular orbits; that Earth is third from the centre and the only one to sustain life. And there, for most people, it ends, with that horrible ‘only one’ statement making it seem that none of the other miriad objects in the universe holds anything of interest. Well here’s the good stuff, off the top of my head, about the first four planets:

Mercury
Smaller than Ganymede, one of the moons of Jupiter. Temperature goes from -170°C at night to 250°C during the day. Its day is nearly ten times as bright as Earth’s. At certain times, if you were to stand on the surface of Mercury at the right point, you could watch the sun rise in the sky, stop, then go back and set in the East. It would then rise again and continue on its way.
Venus
The weird uncle of the solar system. Women are from Venus, because it’s completely bonkers. Almost every body in the solar system (indeed almost every body in the galaxy) rotates counterclockwise when viewed from above Earth’s North pole. Every planet, asteroid, moon and comet orbits and rotates in that direction. But not Venus. It spins backwards. Venus is hotter than Mercury even though it’s further from the sun, because it has a huge carbon-dioxide atmosphere that would crush, dissolve and melt a metal can with its strong heat, pressure and acidity. Though Earth is the only planet on which people could survive, I can never shake the feeling that venus is somehow less hospitable than the rest. It’s just mean
Earth
Think of how much you know. All the people, places, history, geography. Think of all the cultures in all of the world. Think of what came before them; cave men, early hominids, ancient mammals, dinosaurs, ambitious fish, bacteria, a single self-replicator that became the common ancestor to everything that ever lived or will live. That’s all Earth. Our moon is made of Earth; that is, at some time in the past it was torn off and left hanging in space destined to protect our developing world from asteroids that would have spelled doom for our ancestors. Just think that almost everyone, ever, has seen the moon as you can see it every night.
Mars
You can’t have failed to hear about Mars recently. It has an apetite for probes. It also has two moons, Phobos and Deimos. Phobos is so close to Mars that it has to orbit incredibly fast just to stay up, but its orbit is slowing down. Some time in the future Phobos will crash into Mars with a force far in excess of anything we could create with an atomic bomb. Deimos is so small that you could literally jump off of its surface; you might be lucky enough to land back on it in a day or so.

I could go on with Jupiter’s many moons, including my personal bet for Hell, Callisto; Saturn’s rings and missing spokes; Uranus’s crazy axis; Neptune’s death-sentenced moon Triton; and the peculiar double planet Pluto/Charon. Even an encyclopaedia introduction to the solar system describes a huge array of weird and alien environments. For people who are taken in by science-fiction sets with odd-coloured trees, what would it be like to see (not to mention smell) a moon with solid methane cliffs?

Now as for white dwarfs, neutron stars, pulsars, black holes, quasars and supernovae…